Este legal?

[robi09]

Este legal un site cu desene online. Desenele puse pe site prin embed.

[djhmusic]

Sigur ca da, poti sa vezi chiar la mine www.desenele-copilariei.org, pui si tu acolo termeni si conditii, scrii si pe prima pagina ca nu sunt gazduire la tine si ca nu ai treaba cu drepturile de autor si alte chestii si gata, nu am primit nici o plangere pana acum.

[RobciucIonut]

@robi09 - Din cate stiu, nu ai voie, chiar daca desenele respective nu sunt gazduite de tine.

[robi09]

Robciuc aia stiam si eu, ca totusi sunt distribuite de acel site, si pentru distribuire trebuie sa ai dreptul de la autor. mai astept si alte pareri. ;)

[pancu]

nu e ilegal. ;)

[isshmen]

nu e ilegal. ;)

De ce ?!? Ca ai tu? :P

[costyn33l]

Este si ilegal si legal.

Desene precut Naruto nu se pot cumpara din magazin.
Si este legal.

O sa revin mai tarziu cu informatii mai multe.

[Lucian00]

Eu consider ca daca preiei desenele de pe un site gen youtube.com este ok , deoarece de aceea exista "Share this video".Este ilegal sa uploadezi desene pe youtube fara drept de autor.

[RobciucIonut]

@Lucian00 - Atat timp cat oferi si altora (nu conteaza ca tu le-ai uploadat sau ca ai pus embed/ link pe site-ul tau) fisierele fara drept de autor, este ilegal!

[pancu]

@Lucian00 - Atat timp cat oferi si altora (nu conteaza ca tu le-ai uploadat sau ca ai pus embed/ link pe site-ul tau) fisierele fara drept de autor, este ilegal!
ai consultat un avocat in privinta asta?
iti dau un exemplu. eu iau un videoclip de pe youtube si il pun la mine pe site. Crezi ca e de datoria mea sa verific daca youtube are drept sau nu de difuzare a acelui videoclip?
e de datoria mea sa verific daca trilulilu are contract cu AIMR de difuzare a muzicii? Pot eu verifica ce contracte are fiecare sa stiu daca sunt in ilegalitate sau nu? NU. E raspunderea lor. Atata timp cat tu nu ai uploadat fisiere protejate de lege, poti sa stai linistit. ;)

@costyn33l aberezi..

Dupa teoria voasta si google e ilegal. ca doar si el ofera linkuri spre siteuri de download fisiere protejate nu? ;)
http://www.google.ro/search?aq=0&oq=download+we+no+spe&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=download+we+no+speak+americano

[robi09]

Pancu cam ai dreptate, mai astept raspunsuri de la Dennis , Netul etc, cei care sunt bine informati.

Multumesc.

[netul]

Youtube are inltelegeri si plateste taxe catre case de discuri, studiouri etc....


6. Your Content and Conduct

B. You shall be solely responsible for your own Content and the consequences of submitting and publishing your Content on the Service. You affirm, represent, and warrant that you own or have the necessary licenses, rights, consents, and permissions to publish Content you submit; and you license to YouTube all patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other proprietary rights in and to such Content for publication on the Service pursuant to these Terms of Service

For clarity, you retain all of your ownership rights in your Content. However, by submitting Content to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the Content in connection with the Service and YouTube's (and its successors' and affiliates') business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Service (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. You also hereby grant each user of the Service a non-exclusive license to access your Content through the Service, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such Content as permitted through the functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service. The above licenses granted by you in video Content you submit to the Service terminate within a commercially reasonable time after you remove or delete your videos from the Service. You understand and agree, however, that YouTube may retain, but not display, distribute, or perform, server copies of your videos that have been removed or deleted. The above licenses granted by you in user comments you submit are perpetual and irrevocable.

You further agree that Content you submit to the Service will not contain third party copyrighted material, or material that is subject to other third party proprietary rights, unless you have permission from the rightful owner of the material or you are otherwise legally entitled to post the material and to grant YouTube all of the license rights granted herein.

You further agree that you will not submit to the Service any Content or other material that is contrary to the YouTube Community Guidelines, currently found at http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines, which may be updated from time to time, or contrary to applicable local, national, and international laws and regulations.http://www.youtube.com/t/terms

Userii sunt responsabili pt continutul uploadat pe Youtube, continut care nu trebuie sa incalce drepturile de autor. Daca sunt depistate videouri ilegale sau care incalca drepturile de autor, ele vor vi sterse de pe site deci automat nu vor mai merge nici pe siteurile unde sunt preluate.

Din punctul meu de vedere, preluarea de pe Youtube nu este ilegala. Dar asta nu e valabil in cazul preluarii de materiale ilegale de pe alte siteuri (siteuri de filme online de exemplu)


pui si tu acolo termeni si conditii, scrii si pe prima pagina ca nu sunt gazduire la tine si ca nu ai treaba cu drepturile de autor si alte chestii si gata, nu am primit nici o plangere pana acum.

Asta e o mare prostie care, din pacate, am auzit-o la multi useri de aici.

Legea dreptului de autor pedepseste punerea la dispozitie a materialelor ilegale. Prin punerea la dispozitie se intelege SI preluarea materialelor de pe alte servere, nu e neaparat ca sa fie gazduite pe propriul server. Atat timp cat un video ilegal se poate vizualiza pe siteul tau, incalci legea fie ca gazduiesti acel material pe server fie ca il preiei de pe alte servere.

Legat strict de Youtube, este legal sa se preia anumite materiale deoarece Youtube, cum am zis, plateste taxe si colaboreaza cu case de discuri pentru a avea acceptul de a pune videoclipuri. Iar daca unele case de discuri nu doresc ca alte siteuri sa preia videoclipuri, ii da disable la embed si nu se pot prelua. Iar maretialele ilegale puse pe Youtube nu au viata lunga, sunt scoase in scurt timp.


Este si ilegal si legal.
Desene precut Naruto nu se pot cumpara din magazin.
Si este legal.


O prostie si mai mare. Daca nu se pot cumpara din magazin, asta nu inseamna ca le poti pune pe site.

[robi09]

Eu voi pune de pe diverse site-uri care ofera embed ( nu site-uri de filme online etc, youtube, 220, metacafe, trilulilu, peteava etc. ), este ilegal?

[netul]

Atat timp cat siteurile respective sunt legale (platesc taxe, au acceptul de a pune videouri cu drept de autor, colaboreaza cu institutiile respective etc), este legal. Parerea mea. Insa daca tu uploadezi un video ilegal (un film de exmplu) si apoi dai embed pe siteul tau, este ilegal.

[pancu]

@Netul. Eu nu consider ca e de datoria mea sa verific daca un site ca megavideo.com e legal sau nu. Cine sunt eu sa fac aceasta supozitie? Am vreo autoriatate? Nu cred.
Toate siteurile UGC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User-generated_content) sunt protejate de DMCA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act). Nu conteaza ca esti youtube,trilulilu, megavideo sau alt site.

Extrase.
Viacom Inc. vs. YouTube, Google Inc.
On March 13, 2007, Viacom filed a lawsuit against YouTube and its corporate parent Google for copyright infringement seeking more than $1 billion in damages. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Viacom claims the popular video-sharing site was engaging in "massive intentional copyright infringement" for making available a contended 160,000 unauthorized clips of Viacom's entertainment programming. Google lawyers say they are relying on the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act to shield them from liability.[6] On June 23, 2010, U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton granted summary judgment in favor of YouTube.[7] The court held that YouTube is protected by the safe harbor of the DMCA. Viacom has said that it will appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit as soon as possible. [8]

Linking to infringing content

The law is currently unsettled with regard to websites that contain links to infringing material; however, there have been a few lower-court decisions which have ruled against linking in some narrowly prescribed circumstances. One is when the owner of a website has already been issued an injunction against posting infringing material on their website and then links to the same material in an attempt to circumvent the injunction. Another area involves linking to software or devices which are designed to circumvent DRM (digital rights management) devices, or links from websites whose sole purpose is to circumvent copyright protection by linking to copyrighted material.[4]
There have been no cases in the US where a website owner has been found liable for linking to copyrighted material outside of the above narrow circumstances.

REPET: Atata timp cat NU tu ai uploadat materialele, nu ai ce sa patesti..

[RobciucIonut]

@pancu -
REPET: Atata timp cat NU tu ai uploadat materialele, nu ai ce sa patesti..
Eu din cate stiu, nu ai voie sa oferi si altora fisiere ilegale (embed), chiar daca nu tu ai uploadat videoul. Am citit eu asta undeva, pe Go4IT parca.

[pancu]

stii engleza? Ai citit ce am scris eu mai sus?